Cases 1 - 9 of 9
G.L. v. Catanio, et al
as 2:2022cv01686
Plaintiff:
G. L.
Defendant:
Melanie Catanio, Nancy Cochrane, Donald Rowberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Catanio et al
as 2:2022at00986
Defendant:
Melanie Catanio, Anne Marie Schubert, Nancy Cochrane and others
Washington v. San Mateo County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2022cv01347
Plaintiff:
Deandrea Washington
Defendant:
San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, Dave Pine, Carole Groom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Majors v. Pine et al
as 5:2022cv01343
Plaintiff:
Willie Majors
Defendant:
Dave Pine, Don Horsely, Supervisor Warren Slocum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Alexander v. County of San Mateo, et al
as 20-17189
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN MATEO MEDICAL CENTER, SAN MATEO COUNTY HEALTH COMMISSION, ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY PROFESSIONALS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER
Michael Alexander v. County of San Mateo, et al
as 20-16861
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN MATEO MEDICAL CENTER, SAN MATEO COUNTY HEALTH COMMISSION, ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY PROFESSIONALS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER
Alexander v. County of San Mateo et al
as 3:2020cv05179
Defendant:
Carlos G. Bolanos, Lt. Daniel Reynolds, Don Horsley and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stanislaus Funding, Inc. v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv04646
Defendant:
Janice Hahn, Federal Glover, Don Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Stanislaus Funding, Inc. d/b/a Patioworld and Stanislaus Funding, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Patioworld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoon v. Newsom et al
as 3:2020cv03141
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Supervisor David Canepa, City of Pacifica and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Antoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
