Cases 1 - 10 of 29
FRANCO v. PENN HIGHLANDS CONNELLSVILLE HOSPITAL
as 2:2025cv00665
Defendant:
PENN HIGHLANDS CONNELLSVILLE HOSPITAL and Highlands Hospital
Plaintiff:
DAVID FRANCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franco v. Bill Davis Trucking, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01052
Defendant:
Ronald Goings and Bill Davis Trucking, Inc
Plaintiff:
David Franco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Oscar Franco-Constante
as 24-12328
Defendant:
OSCAR DAVID FRANCO-CONSTANTE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Franco v. Just One Dime, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
David Franco
Defendant:
Just One Dime, LLC, Just One Dime Coaching, LLC, Veritus Texas One, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FRANCO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57474
Plaintiff:
DAVID FRANCO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franco v. Brunswick Hospital Center, Inc.
as 2:2020cv05735
Plaintiff:
David Franco
Defendant:
Brunswick Hospital Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bennett et al v. Burwell et al
as 2:2020cv01814
Plaintiff:
Matthew Clark, John Brandon, George Bennett and others
Defendant:
Robert Lind, David Franco, NHI LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bennett et al v. Burwell et al
as 2:2020at00886
Plaintiff:
Matthew Clark, John Brandon, George Bennett and others
Defendant:
Robert Lind, David Franco, NHI LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Halma Investment Holdings Limited et al v. Juan Antonio Bonel Borssen et al
as 2:2020cv06953
Defendant:
DANIEL S. DURRIE, EDWARD PETERSON, UNITED NODOTS LTD. and others
Petitioner:
JAY PEPOSE
Plaintiff:
Halma Investment Holdings Limited
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
v. FRANCO et al
as 3:2020cv02147
Defendant:
ROBERT LIND and DAVID FRANCO
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
