Cases 1 - 10 of 18
David Rudometkin v. Daniel Driscoll
as 25-5033
Plaintiff:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth, in her capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army and Daniel Driscoll, in his capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army
Rudometkin v. Thomas et al
as 5:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
David J Rudometkin
Defendant:
Billy J Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
David Rudometkin, et al v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 23-5218
Plaintiff / Appellee:
David J. Rudometkin, Corry P. Brooks and Robert L. Barnett, III, and others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexander L. Driskill
Defendant / Appellee:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, in his capacity as the Secretary of Defense
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
David Rudometkin v. Christine Wormuth
as 23-5181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant / Appellee:
Christine E. Wormuth, in her capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army
David Rudometkin v. USA
as 23-5180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
David Rudometkin v. Ryan McCarthy
as 23-5088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant / Appellee:
Ryan D. McCarthy, in his capacity as the Secretary of the Army
David Rudometkin v. Christine Wormuth
as 23-5053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant / Appellee:
Christine E. Wormuth, in her capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army
Rudometkin v. Johnston, et al
as 22-3250
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID J. RUDOMETKIN
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL JOHNSTON and CHRISTINE WORMUTH
Rudometkin v. Commanding General
as 3:2022cv00497
Petitioner:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant:
Commanding General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
