Cases 1 - 10 of 304
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LOPEZ v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2025cv03305
Plaintiff:
DAVID LOPEZ
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, BAYONNE REDEVELOPERS URBAN RENEWAL, JOHN DOES 1-10 (fictitiously named individuals) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Alzuarte v. Brown Brothers Asphalt and Concrete, LLC et al
as 1:2025cv00639
Plaintiff:
David Lopez Alzuarte
Defendant:
Brown Brothers Asphalt and Concrete, LLC and Rapid Material Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 - Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
Heneen v. Judah et al
as 8:2025cv00138
Plaintiff:
Peter Heneen
Defendant:
Joshua Judah, Steven Goreck, Michael Kennon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lopez v. Rios et al
as 3:2025cv00363
Defendant:
Dr. Hal Grotke and Dr. Kathryn Rios
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v INTOUCH WIRELESS et al.
as 2:2024cv11092
Plaintiff:
FATIMAH MORGAN
Defendant:
INTOUCH WIRELESS, METRO BY T-MOBILE, EDWIN LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Lopez-Wheelock v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2024cv02186
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff:
David Lopez-Wheelock
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pryor, et al. v. Blackhawk Network, Inc.
as 24-6906
Plaintiff:
STEVE PRYOR, BRIAN O'CONNOR, LISA MIKEC and others
Appellant:
MIRIAM MABEL BROWN and DAVID LOPEZ
Defendant:
BLACKHAWK NETWORK, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
