Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gary Morga v. David Michery et al
as 8:2025cv00718
Plaintiff:
Gary Morga
Defendant:
David Michery, Jonathan New, Johnathan Andersen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Cayden Crume et al v. Mullen Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv02620
Plaintiff:
Cayden Crume, James LeGrand and Todd Holton
Defendant:
Mullen Automotive, Inc., David Michery, Jonathan New and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jennifer Maloney v. Mullen Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv01187
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Maloney
Defendant:
David Michery, Jonathan New, Mullen Automotive, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
MARTIS v. MICHERY et al
as 2:2024cv02908
Plaintiff:
MARIUS MARTIS
Defendant:
DAVID MICHERY, MARY WINTER, MARK BETOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
CARIS v. MICHERY
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
CHOSTEN CARIS
Defendant:
DAVID MICHERY and MULLEN AUTOMOTIVE INC AND BOARD
Hany Morsy v. David Michery et al
as 2:2022cv07139
Plaintiff:
Hany Morsy
Defendant:
David Michery, Ignacio Novoa, Mary Winter and others
Jeff Witt et al v. David Michery et al
as 2:2022cv05336
Plaintiff:
Jeff Witt and Joseph Birbigalia
Defendant:
David Michery, Ignacio Novoa, Mary Winter and others
Debtor In Possession:
Kent Puckett
David Gru v. Mullen Automotive, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
David Gru
Defendant:
Mullen Automotive, Inc. f/k/a Net Element, Inc., David Michery, Oleg Firer and others
Margaret Schaub v. Mullen Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03026
Plaintiff:
Margaret Schaub
Defendant:
Mullen Automotive, Inc., David Michery, Oleg Firer and others
William Alessi v. Mullen Technologies, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
William Alessi
Defendant:
Mullen Technologies, Inc., Mullen Automotive, Inc., Net Element, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
