Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Lozado v. Rich
as 5:2025hc02024
Petitioner: Luis A. Lozado
Respondent: David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stine v. Young et al
as 5:2024ct03298
Defendant: Mr. Jackson, Ms. N. Sharkey, Mr. Grose and others
Plaintiff: Mikeal Glenn Stine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hayes v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02220
Respondent: Warden David Rich
Petitioner: Keynod Antonio Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stine v. Rider et al
as 5:2024ct03277
Defendant: Asst. Warden Flowers, Lt. M. Ball, David Rich and others
Plaintiff: Mikeal Glenn Stine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robinson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024hc02209
Respondent: United States of America and Warden David Rich
Petitioner: Erick Richard Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McRae v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02201
Petitioner: Andre McRae
Respondent: David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Armistead v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02199
Respondent: David Rich
Petitioner: Kristofer Ty Armistead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez-Ortega, et al v. Rich, et al
as 24-2163
Defendant: DAVID RICH, NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and KENNETH LUCERO, in their official and individual capacities
Plaintiff: JEREMY RODRIGUEZ-ORTEGA and JOSHUA RODRIGUEZ
Type: Labor FMLA
Johnson v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02188
Respondent: Warden David Rich
Petitioner: Anthony C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lozada v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02171
Petitioner: Luis Angel Lozada
Respondent: Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?