Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Tamika Seay v. United States Department of Justice, et al
as 24-12971
Defendant:
ROBERT V. RODATUS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ASHLEY STINSON and others
Plaintiff:
TAMIKA SEAY
Tamika Seay v. Andrea David Vega
as 24-12974
Plaintiff:
TAMIKA SEAY
Defendant:
ANDREA JO ANNE DAVID VEGA
Tamika Seay v. Andrea David Vega
as 24-12729
Defendant:
ANDREA JO ANNE DAVID VEGA
Plaintiff:
TAMIKA SEAY
Tamika Seay v. United States Department of Justice, et al
as 24-12718
Defendant:
ANDREA DAVID-VEGA, ASHLEY STINSON, ROBERT V. RODATUS and others
Plaintiff:
TAMIKA SEAY
Seay v. David Vega
as 1:2024mi00083
Defendant:
Andrea Jo Anne David Vega
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Eli Matthews v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
Eli Matthews
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Jaime Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vega v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00822
Petitioner:
David Vega, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Guardado Perez et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv11353
Plaintiff:
Ligia G Guardado Perez, Gerson Joel Vega, Gerson David Vega Guardado and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, M.D. Irving Danesh and R.N. Joseph Mazzuchelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Seay v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv04922
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Andrea David Vega and Judge Robert V. Rodatus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Seay et al v. Vega
as 1:2022cv03526
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay and Melvin Seay
Defendant:
Andrea David Vega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
