Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Candace Amborn v. David Weibel, et al
as 20-35099
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID A. WEIBEL and U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CANDACE AMBORN, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of Robert W. Christensen and Marlene J. Christensen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-35857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Arnot v. Weibel et al
as 3:2017mc00034
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Arnot
Defendant:
US Bank, NA and David A. Weibel
Roberta Kelly v. Anna Brown, et al
as 12-35296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTA KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNA J. BROWN, C. MARIE ECKERT, MILLER NASH LLP-US BANK and others
Kelly v. USBANCORP-USBANK-GMAC-MERS et al
as 3:2012cv00199
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Rodriguez v. Discover Bank et al
as 3:2011cv02155
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Orbeta Rodriguez
Defendant:
Discover Bank, Bishop White Marshall & Weibel, P.S. , William L. Bishop, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kelly v. Brown et al
as 3:2011cv00975
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kelly v. Eckert et al
as 3:2011cv00949
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00835
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
