Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ajaj v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 19-1250
Defendant:
D. PARRY, Officer, in his official capacity, KENNETH CRANK, Inmate Trust Fund Supervisor, in his official capacity, D. PARRY, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD AJAJ
Pinson v. Berkebile
as 16-1347
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID B. BERKEBILE
Bruce v. Denney, et al
as 15-3263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD DENNEY, Regional Psychology Services Administrator, MORRIS LEWIS, Regional Psychology Treatment Program Coordinator, PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director and others
Mallett v. Simpler et al
as 1:2014cv02323
Plaintiff:
Dawane Arthur Mallett
Defendant:
Mike Simpler, J. Munoz, David B. Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallett v. Vargas et al
as 1:2014cv02198
Plaintiff:
Dawane Arthur Mallett
Defendant:
K. Vargas, Payne, David B. Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Denney et al
as 5:2014cv03026
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Donald Denney, Morris Lewis, Paul Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mallett v. Fitzgerald et al
as 1:2014cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dawane Arthur Mallett
Defendant:
L. Fitzgerald, T. Martinez and David B. Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallett v. Garner et al
as 1:2013cv02899
Plaintiff:
Dawane Arthur Mallett
Defendant:
Garner, T. Gardiner, Joseph Wadas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallett v. Law et al
as 1:2013cv02676
Plaintiff:
Dawane Arthur Mallett
Defendant:
David Owen Law, A. Balsick, N. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallett et al, vs. Holder, et al
as 1:2013cv02273
Petitioner:
Dawane Arthur Mallett and Hillard Lamarcus
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr., David B. Berkebile, Shun Kuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
