Cases 1 - 10 of 41
G.I.S.E. et al v. City of Chico et al
as 2:2022cv01654
Plaintiff:
G.I.S.E. and Eddie Sanchez
Defendant:
City of Chico, Mark Bass and David Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
G.I.S.E. et al v. City of Chico et al
as 2:2022at00962
Plaintiff:
G.I.S.E. and Eddie Sanchez
Defendant:
City of Chico, Mark Bass and David Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bailey v. USA
as 1:2021cv00034
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael David Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
David Worden v. Krista Heming et al
as 2:2021cv01400
Defendant:
Krista Heming, The Heming Firm, LLC, Theresa Richard and others
Plaintiff:
David Worden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Adelman et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2019cv02093
Plaintiff:
John Mayer, Eleanor "Elly" Adelman, June Hilton Walker and others
Defendant:
City of Portland, Commissioner Nick Fish, Director Adena Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Hunt v. Israel Gonzalez, et al
as 17-35775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
ISRAEL R. GONZALEZ, JEFFERY UTTECHT, DAVID BAILEY and others
Abiodun et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv05154
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ortegon, Joonho Park, William Bethel and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc, Audi Aktiengesellschaft, Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Donald R Hunt
Defendant:
David Bailey , Che , Jacqueline L Fluaitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2016cv05125
Plaintiff:
Donald R Hunt
Defendant:
David Bailey , Che , Jacqueline L Fluaitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Lopez
as 1:2014cv01854
Plaintiff:
David Bailey
Defendant:
J. Lopez, J. Tangen and M. Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
