Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bailey v. Homesite Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv03089
Plaintiff:
David Bailey
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USAA Life Insurance Company v. Bailey et al
as 5:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
USAA Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
David Bailey, George Voss and Jimmie Voss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jennifer Gutierrez, et al v. Selection Mgmt Sys, Inc., et al
as 22-3621
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JENNIFER GUTIERREZ, co-Trustee of the Charles and Rita Bailey Living Trust and co-Executor of the Estate on behalf of Charles David Bailey and BREE ALEXANDER, co-Trustee of the Charles and Rita Bailey Living Trust, and co-Executor of the Estate of Charles David Bailey
Defendant / Appellant:
SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC, dba Selection.com and JOHN P. HART, JR., aka John P. Hart, II
Bailey et al v. Progressive Classic Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv06021
Plaintiff:
David Bailey and Leah Bailey
Defendant:
Progressive Classic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARTCH v. CAREY et al
as 1:2012cv00718
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL PARTCH
Defendant:
WILLIAM V. CAREY, CHRISTOPHER BIEDERMANN, DAVID BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIMMEL v. CAREY et al
as 1:2011cv06935
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HIMMEL
Defendant:
WILLIAM V. CAREY, CHRISTOPHER BIEDERMANN, DAVID BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YEUNG v. CAREY et al
as 1:2011cv06667
Plaintiff:
YING YEUNG
Defendant:
WILLIAM V. CAREY, DAVID BAILEY, N. SCOTT FINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. MSM, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv04056
Plaintiff:
Oaklea Phillips, Vonda Siler and B. L. Lewis, III
Defendant:
MSM, Inc., MSO, Inc., David Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
