Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Diaz v. State of Rhode Island et al.
as 1:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Diaz
Defendant:
Attorney General Peter F. Neronha, Superior Court Mag. Richard Rospallo, Defense Attorney Thomas Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2021cv00208
Defendant:
David Curtin, Maureen B Keough, Judy Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LawHQ, LLC et al v. Curtin
as 1:2020cv00033
Defendant:
David Curtin
Plaintiff:
LawHQ, LLC and Thomas Alvord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vose v. Kilmartin et al
as 1:2019cv00409
Defendant:
David Curtin, City of Pawtucket, Peter DiBiase, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Vose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapter 4 Corp. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv04566
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", David Curtin, ruolanshangwu888-7 and others
Plaintiff:
Chapter 4 Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
McKenna v. Curtin, et al
as 17-1006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVEN A. MCKENNA
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CURTIN, LAURA A. PESATURO, JOHN SEKARCHI and others
Defendant:
HELEN MCDONALD
McKenna v. Curtin et al
as 1:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Keven A. McKenna
Defendant:
David Curtin, Laura A. Pesaturo, John Sekarchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenna v. Gershkoff et al
as 1:2012cv00904
Plaintiff:
Keven McKenna
Defendant:
Susan Gershkoff, Marc DeSisto and David Curtin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CURTIN v. CURTIN et al
as 2:2009cv66340
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CURTIN and DAVID CURTIN
Defendant:
CELOTEX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Becker v. Warden Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jan Becker
Defendant:
Warden Hudson, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jack Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
