Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Adams v. Driskell et al
as 6:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Adams
Defendant:
David Driskell, Debra Sanders, Kimberly Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00421
Defendant:
Warden David Driskell, Administrator Lorie Davis and LT W Glasgow
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wesley Kimble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Driskell et al
as 6:2018cv00364
Plaintiff:
Max A Kelley
Defendant:
David Driskell, Ricky Wilson and Management and Training Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Driskell et al
as 5:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
Max A Kelley
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, David Driskell and Ricky Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnette v. Driskell
as 5:2016cv01089
Petitioner:
Isiah Dewayne Barnette
Respondent:
David Driskell
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnette v. Driskell
as 5:2016cv01090
Petitioner:
Isiah Dewayne Barnette
Respondent:
David Driskell
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnette v. Driskell
as 5:2016cv01091
Petitioner:
Isiah Dewayne Barnette
Respondent:
David Driskell
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Marquardt et al
as 9:2016cv00124
Plaintiff:
Adrian Taylor
Defendant:
Robert Scott Marquardt, Robert L Marquardt, Lyle Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Marquardt et al
as 9:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
Kirk Davis
Defendant:
Robert Scott Marquardt, Robert L Marquardt, Lyle Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Marquardt et al
as 9:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Porter
Defendant:
Robert Scott Marquardt, Robert L Marquardt, Lyle Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
