Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wood v. Lumpkin
as 7:2022cv00204
Petitioner:
David Edward Wood
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Matthew Steel, Cody McGallion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Matthew Steel, Cody McGallion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Gabriel Miranda Jr v. Harlingen Consolidated Independent School District et al
as 7:2018cv00348
Defendant:
Valley Forensics, PLLC, David Edward White, City Of Edinburg and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Gabriel Miranda Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BMO Capital Markets Corp. v. UBS Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00723
Plaintiff:
BMO Capital Markets Corp.
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services, Inc. , Miles Redfield , David Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2012cv02068
Plaintiff:
James David Edwards and Ann Bennett Edwards
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Edwards v. Perdue Family et al
as 4:2011cv00862
Plaintiff:
David Edwards
Defendant:
Perdue Family and Ft. Worth Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
