Cases 1 - 7 of 7
GARDEN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2020cv00339
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff:
DAVID GARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARDEN v. STATE FARM INSURANCE
as 1:2018cv01436
Plaintiff:
DAVID GARDEN
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
GARDEN v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv01150
Petitioner:
DAVID GARDEN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garden v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00249
Petitioner:
David Garden
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coil, Bobby v. Mason, Sara et al
as 3:2014cv00704
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Coil
Defendant:
Sara Mason , David Gardener , Tim Haines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Garden et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv08445
Plaintiff:
Darin Chavez, Sandra Chavez and David Garden
Defendant:
Doe 1 through Doe 10 and Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
Erica P John Fund Inc et al v. Halliburton Company et al
as 3:2002cv01152
Plaintiff:
Paul J Benec, Erica P John Fund Inc, Gabriel T Forrest and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Alida S Coelho, John A Coelho, Robert W Davis and others
Defendant:
Halliburton Company and Robert R Harl
Consolidated Defendant:
Arthur Andersen LLP, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP, David J Lesar and others
In Re:
Highlands Insurance Company
Petitioner:
The Benec Group, Forrest Lead Plaintiffs, John Miletello and others
Not Yet Classified:
Lawrence J Irving
Not Classified By Court:
Gary McGowan and Scott+Scott LLP
Interested Party:
DII Industries, LLC Asbestos PI Trust, Bryan O Blevins, Jr., Joseph F Rice and others
Intervenor:
Ben Alan Murphey, City of Dearborn Heights Act 345 Police & Fire Retirement System, Laborers National Pension Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
