Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Estate of David H. Brooks v. USA, et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Interested Party:
Elizabeth Brooks, Andrew Brooks, Jeffrey Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of David H. Brooks
Defendant:
USA and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
The Estate of David H. Brooks v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv24057
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau Of Prisons and The United States of America
Plaintiff:
The Estate of David H. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Levitt v. Brooks
as 9:2017mc80527
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Levitt
Defendant:
David H. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks v. Menendez et al
as 1:2016cv21404
Plaintiff:
David H. Brooks
Defendant:
R. Menendez, Inerio Alarcon, MD, John Doe # 1, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01090
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00632
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
United States of America v. Schlegel (Brooks)
as 14-2577
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dawn Schlegel, Sandra Hatfield and Patricia Lennex
Defendant - Appellant:
David H. Brooks
United States of America v. Brooks
as 14-2682
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
David H. Brooks
United States of America v. Brooks
as 2:2014mc00209
Defendant:
David H. Brooks
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Schlegel (Brooks)
as 13-3901
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Appellant:
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Defendant:
Dawn Schlegel, Sandra Hatfield and Patricia Lennex
Defendant - Appellee:
David H. Brooks
Interested-Third-Party:
David B. Smith and George Stavropoulos
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
