Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Michael Harrison v. USA
as 22-13697
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID HARRISON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harrison v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv01406
Petitioner:
Michael David Harrison
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Morton v. D.R. Horton, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Michael Morton, Lisa Morton, Jeremy Smith and others
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc., D.R. Horton, Inc.-Birmingham, Bethel Engineering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61497
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRISON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53449
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAVID HARRISON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leonard v. PeachCap Tax & Advisory, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02164
Defendant:
PeachCap Tax & Advisory, LLC, Eric Steven Burnette and David Harrison Miller
Plaintiff:
Clyde E. Leonard, Jr.
USA v. Michael Harrison
as 21-10453
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID HARRISON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93906
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv85475
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv74431
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
