Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dorarena Boyd v. Metropolitan Funeral Services
as 19-2178
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN C. ST. JOHN, U.S. CONGRESSWOMAN ELAINE LURIA, MICHAEL R. KATCHMARK and others
Plaintiff:
HONORABLE JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, HONORABLE ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DORARENA BOYD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd et al v. Metropolitan Funeral Services et al
as 2:2019cv00337
Plaintiff:
The Honorable Joseph R. Biden Jr, VA Inspector General, The Honorable Elijah E. Cummings and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Funeral Services, Virginia Cochran, Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Childers v. Northam et al
as 2:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Craig M. Burshem, David J. Whitted, Ralph Northam and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Childers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milso Industries Corporation v. The Whitting Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04559
Plaintiff:
Milso Industries Corporation
Defendant:
The Whitting Group, Inc., David J. Whitting, III Strettle F. Whitting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Mark Barnes v. David Whitted
as 12-8164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID J. WHITTED, Deputy Assitant Commonwealth Attorney and H. K. BEVERLY, JR., Attorney Private
Mark Barnes v. Nancy Parr
as 11-6454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY PARR, Head Commonwealth Attorney, DAVID J. WHITTED, Deputy Commonwealth Attorney and D. J. GEIGER, Deputy Executive Director Virginia Indigent Defense Commission
Barnes v. Parr et al
as 1:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Barnes
Defendant:
Nancy Parr, David J Whitted and D.J. Geiger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
