Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Johnson v. Carparts Distribution Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Carparts Distribution Center, Inc. and Hahn Automotive Warehouse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02782
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Barbara Johnson and David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01237
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Barbara Johnson and David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2016cv11311
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Burns v. Johnson, et al
as 15-1982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHLEEN BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, Secretary US Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration and DAVID JOHNSON, Supervisory Air Marshal, in his individual and official capacities
Johnson v. National Business Furniture
as 1:2013cv12475
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
National Business Furniture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burns v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2013cv12155
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Burns
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano and David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Weare, Town of et al
as 1:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Lyon's Auto, NH Department of Transportation, Other Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. Advanced Delivery Systems, Inc.
as 1:2010cv11731
Defendant:
Advanced Delivery Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ezequiel Antonio Garcia, Jose Rodriquez Manuel, Rickie David Johnson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
