Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Henry et al v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00609
Not Classified By Court:
David Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Nicole Henry, Lakeisha Ruffin and David Mitchell, -
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Roerig v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
as 7:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell Roerig
Defendant:
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Jeffrey Mitchell
as 17-10383
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY DAVID MITCHELL
Mitchell v. Thomas et al
as 3:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
Clarence Roberts and Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoff et al v. McCoy Corporation
as 1:2016cv00988
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hoff, David Mitchell, Melissa Pool and others
Defendant:
McCoy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Mitchell v. Smart et al
as 4:2014cv00457
Petitioner:
Brian David Mitchell
Respondent:
Elizabeth Smart and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carol Paselk v. State of Texas, et al
as 13-41049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL PASELK
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, HOPKINS COUNTY TEXAS, HOPKINS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, and also all unidentified associates, directors, staff, empoloyees, officers, and volunteers in their official and individual capacities and others
Mitchell v. State Farm LLoyds
as 1:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
State Farm LLoyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Paselk v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00754
Plaintiff:
Carol Paselk
Defendant:
State of Texas, Hopkins County Texas, Hopkins County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
