Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Lay v. Orman, et al
as 16-7085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE LAY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ORMAN, Postal Agent, OSP, NEAMYRA RIDDLE, Postal Agent Director, OSP, ANITA TRAMMEL, Warden and others
Lay v. Orman, et al
as 16-7060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE LAY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ORMAN, Postal Agent, OSP, NEAMYRA RIDDLE, Postal Agent Director, OSP, ANITA TRAMMEL, Warden and others
Williams v. Trammell, et al
as 16-7026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KEITH WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL, JOHN MARLAR, MONA ALLEN and others
Washington v. Trammell, et al
as 15-7032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY B. WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL and DAVID ORMAN
Dopp v. Jones, et al
as 14-6088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LYNN DOPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, JOHNNY BLEVINS, RANDY KNIGHT and others
Cathey v. Jones, et al
as 13-7022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL ROBERT CATHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director of DOC, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden OSP and others
In re: Knox
as 12-7060
Petitioner:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Respondent:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Cathey v. Jones, et al
as 12-7031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL ROBERT CATHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director of DOC, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden OSP and others
Knox v. Orman, et al
as 12-6066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ORMAN, Mailroom Supervisor, MIKE OAKLEY, General Counsel, CRAIG MARSHAL, Assistant AG and others
Barrett v. Workman, et al
as 12-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB BARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, DEBBIE MORTON, Deputy Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, CHAD BROWN, Case Worker, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
