Cases filed in California
David Pierce et al v. Abanoob Abdel-Malak
as 5:2021cv00234
Plaintiff: Desiree Pierce, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Nicolette Pierce and others
Defendant: Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Pierce et al v. Abanoob Abdel-Malak
as 5:2021cv00196
Plaintiff: Breanna Pierce, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Nicolette Pierce and others
Defendant: Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abanoob Abdel-Malak et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv04783
Defendant: Wendy Harris, Kenyl Kiya Kato, Superior Court of California County of San Bernardiono, Riverside, San Diego, Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff: Abanoob Abdel-Malak and Sinai Acquisitions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
David Pierce v. Abanoob Abdel Malak We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv01808
Plaintiff: Desiree Pierce, Riverside Sheriff Dept., Sherrie Pierce and others
Defendant: Abanoob Abdel Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pierce v. Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv02022
Plaintiff: David Pierce
Defendant: Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command , Aecom Technology Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierce v. Director of Corrections and Rehabilitation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00526
Petitioner: Michael David Pierce
Respondent: Director of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Director of CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02244
Petitioner: Michael David Pierce
Respondent: Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?