Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 232
Truitt v. Mcdougle et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff: Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant: Mike Mcdougle, Susanne Campbell, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kolosha v. Rogers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00049
Petitioner: Vitaly Kolosha
Respondent: David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Kolosha v. Rogers
as 24-5002
Petitioner: VITALY KOLOSHA
Respondent: DAVID ROGERS, Warden
Morgan v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00002
Petitioner: David Brian Morgan
Respondent: Joe Biden, United States, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ortega v. Off of the Comp of the Curcy
as 23-60617
Petitioner: Saul Ortega, Former Chief Financial Officer, Director, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board and David Rogers, Jr., Former Chairman of the Board
Respondent: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Morgan v. Biden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv01097
Petitioner: David Brian Morgan
Respondent: Joe Biden and David Rogers
Yargee v. Rogers
as 4:2023cv00501
Petitioner: David Yargee
Respondent: David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kolosha v. Rogers
as 4:2023cv00481
Petitioner: Vitaly Kolosha
Respondent: David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Truitt v. Campbell et al
as 5:2023cv01004
Plaintiff: Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant: Susanne Campbell, Dr Jeanna Morgan, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castleman v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00919
Plaintiff: Mark Wayne Castleman
Defendant: Kevin Stitt, Steven Harpe, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?