Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joel Wetzel v. Daniel Brown, et al
as 14-2605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joel H. Wetzel
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel Brown, Brian Koskovich, Jeremy Moser and others
Defendant:
William A. Herauf, Thomas Henning, James Hope and others
Wallace v. Lamson et al
as 8:2014cv02089
Plaintiff:
Kelso David Wallace
Defendant:
Ms. Bernadette Lamson , Dianna Gunther , Linda Bird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00661
Plaintiff:
Justin David Wallace
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wallace v. Kennard et al
as 2:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
David Wallace
Defendant:
Robert Scott Kennard and Law Offices of Nelson & Kennard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Martinez v The City of Sonora, Texas, et al
as 6:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Raul Martinez
Defendant:
The City of Sonora, Texas, Anthony James Kosub, Charles Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker et al v. Amsted Rail Co., Inc.
as 3:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Baker , Jack Ball , Les Bennett and others
Defendant:
Amsted Rail Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WALLACE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00888
Petitioner:
DAVID WALLACE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
