Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Barrera et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11624
Plaintiff:
Erick Schmidt, Paul Carney, Walter Lopez and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Walsh v. ProGraphics Communications, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02726
Plaintiff:
David Walsh
Defendant:
ProGraphics Communications, LLC, Drummond Press, Inc. and John R. Pope
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
WALSH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv02371
Plaintiff:
DORA JEAN WALSH and BRYAN DAVID WALSH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, IMERYS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Haye v. Hitt et al
as 6:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Donald De La Haye
Defendant:
John C. Hitt , Daniel J. White , A. Dale Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarado et al v. Pasta La Vista, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00998
Plaintiff:
Oscar Alvarado , Caleb Vivar and Rogelio Cano
Defendant:
Pasta La Vista, Inc. , Tove Hansen-Nord and David Walsh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Walsh v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
as 2:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
David Walsh
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walsh v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 7:2012cv04048
Plaintiff:
David Walsh
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Freeman v. McNeilly et al
as 8:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
Freeman
Defendant:
Kathleen McNeilly, J. David Walsh, Joseph G. Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Gjuraj (Simms)
as 11-5224
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isni Gjuraj, Arbnor Gjini, Cookie, Richard Davis, AKA Poo Poo, AKA Shooter, AKA Buck and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Travis Simms, AKA Trav Lo, AKA Love
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
