Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Loyd v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Major Jack Jones, James Emmick, Daviess County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Christian J. Loyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Daviess County Detention Center
as 4:2020cv00092
Plaintiff:
Matthew Andrew Adams
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Borroughs et al
as 4:2020cv00047
Defendant:
Officer Witts, Jack Jones, Officer Borroughs and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius LaVelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thruston v. Whitt et al
as 4:2020cv00042
Plaintiff:
Damartez Da'Quan Thruston
Defendant:
City of Owensboro Kentucky, Daviess County Detention Center, Thomas Whitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaffer v. Daviess County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2019cv00133
Defendant:
Arthur Maglinger, Lorrin Mix, Ohio County Detention Center Medical Contractor and others
Plaintiff:
Brandi Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Smith v. Daviess County Detention Center
as 4:2019cv00120
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Smith
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paris v. Daviess County Detention Center
as 4:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Colby Shah Paris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Daviess County Detention Center
as 4:2019cv00119
Plaintiff:
Joshua Simpson
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Daviess County Detention Center
as 4:2019cv00121
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert v. Daviess County Detention Center
as 4:2019cv00110
Plaintiff:
Michael John Robert
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
