Cases 1 - 10 of 34
(HC) Khademi v. Comiskey
as 2:2025cv01257
Petitioner:
Davood Khademi
Respondent:
Paul W. Comiskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Khademi v. City of Roseville Police Department
as 2:2025cv00732
Petitioner:
Davood Khademi
Respondent:
City of Roseville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Khademi v. Roseville Police Dept.
as 2:2024cv02797
Respondent:
Roseville Police Department
Petitioner:
Davood Khademi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khademi v. Superior Court of Placer County, et al.
as 24-3447
Plaintiff:
DAVOOD KHADEMI
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF PLACER COUNTY, PAUL WAYNE COMISKEY, Criminal Defense Attorney, KEVIN DOHERTY, Criminal Defense Attorney and others
Khademi v. Placer County Sheriff
as 24-1738
Petitioner:
DAVOOD KHADEMI
Respondent:
PLACER COUNTY SHERIFF
Khademi v. City of Roseville Police Deparment
as 24-198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVOOD KHADEMI
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARMENT
Khademi v. INS Immigration and Naturalization
as 23-4325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVOOD KHADEMI
Defendant / Appellee:
INS IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
(PC) Khademi v. Newsome et al
as 2:2023cv02743
Plaintiff:
Davood Khademi
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, City Council and Immigration Naturalization, Services (INS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Khademi v. Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2023cv02675
Plaintiff:
Davood Khademi
Defendant:
Attorney General of California, Sacramento County Council, Placer County Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Khademi v. Supreme Court of CA, et al.
as 2:2023cv02122
Petitioner:
Khademi Davood and Davood Khademi
Respondent:
Supreme Court of California and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
