Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Davidson v. Schmitt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv01665
Petitioner: Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent: David Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean Davidson v. Denise Hacker
as 19-1579
Respondent / Appellee: David Schmitt and Denise Hacker, CCO
Petitioner / Appellant: Dean Bryan Davidson
Davidson v. Schmit
as 4:2018cv00561
Petitioner: Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent: David Schmit and David Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davidson v. Stringer
as 4:2019cv00399
Petitioner: Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent: Mark Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean Davidson v. Mark Stringer
as 19-2196
Respondent / Appellee: Mark Stringer, Director
Petitioner / Appellant: Dean Bryan Davidson
Davidson v. Schmitt.
as 4:2019cv00065
Petitioner: Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent: David Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davidson v. Fulton State Hospital et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv04045
Defendant: Janet Latty, Fulton State Hospital, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff: Dean Bryan Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean Davidson v. Southeast MO Mental Health Ctr, et al
as 18-2227
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dean Bryan Davidson
Defendant / Appellee: Southeast Missouri Mental Health Center, Denise Boyde, Dewane Robertson and others
Dean Davidson v. Southeast MO Mental Health, et al
as 18-2208
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dean Bryan Davidson
Defendant / Appellee: Southeast Missouri Mental Health Center, Denise Boyde and Fulton State Hospital
Dean Davidson v. Fulton State Hospital, et al
as 18-1694
Petitioner: Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent: Fulton State Hospital, Southeast Missouri Mental Health Center and State of Missouri

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?