Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Boyd v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00811
Plaintiff: Dean C. Boyd
Defendant: Mississippi Department of Corrections and Timothy J. Donovan
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Money
as 4:2024cv00105
Defendant: Petria L. Money
Plaintiff: Dean C. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Money
as 3:2024cv00673
Plaintiff: Dean C. Boyd
Defendant: Nurse Petria L. Money
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00496
Defendant: Timothy J. Donovan and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Dean C. Boyd
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Merit Hlth Grp Hosp
as 24-60072
Plaintiff: Dean C. Boyd, also known as Dean C. Boyd, II
Defendant: Merit Health Group Hospital, doing business as Jackson HMA, L.L.C., doing business as Merit Health Central
Boyd v. Allegiance Specialty Hospital
as 23-60423
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee: Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville and Vernell Herzog, CEO
Boyd v. Hughes
as 23-60426
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee: Misty Hughes and Veronica Bell
Boyd v. S&S Management Group
as 23-60398
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee: S&S Management Group, L.L.C., doing business as Advert Group USA
Boyd v. Hughes
as 23-60397
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee: Misty Hughes
Boyd v. Merit Health Group Hospital We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00313
Plaintiff: Dean C. Boyd and Dean C. Boyd, II
Defendant: Merit Health Group Hospital doing business as Jackson HMA, LLC doing business as Merit Health Central
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?