Cases 81 - 90 of 132
Roberts v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Anthony Roshon Roberts, Sr
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Debbie Morton and Joseph Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Morton, et al
as 10-6284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE LAJUAN MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBBIE MORTON, JUSTIN JONES, JOSEPH TAYLOR and others
Burnett v. Jones, et al
as 10-6285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN CRAIG BURNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBBIE MORTON, Administrative Review Authority, JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, JOSEPH TAYLOR, Warden and others
Lewis v. Higgins et al
as 5:2010cv01343
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lonnell Lewis
Defendant:
Haskell Higgins, Phil Gilstrap, Matt Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cathey v. Jones, et al
as 10-7098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL ROBERT CATHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director of DOC, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, MICHAEL JACKSON and others
Williams v. Hill, et al
as 10-7097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON VERAN WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA HILL, DCF Inmate Trust Fund Supervisor, RON ANDERSON, DOC Assistant General Counsel, DEBBIE MORTON, DOC Director's Designee and others
Dopp v. Jones et al
as 5:2010cv01198
Plaintiff:
Richard L Dopp
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Johnny Blevins, Randy Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael v. Newton-Embry et al
as 5:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Linda Michael
Defendant:
Millicent Newton-Embry, Mike Murry, Angela Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart v. Steer et al
as 5:2010cv01026
Plaintiff:
James C Stuart
Defendant:
Donald Steer, Lt Dorame, Debbie Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Henry, et al
as 10-7056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JARI ASKINS, Lieutenant Governor of Oklahoma, T. BASS-LESURE, Oklahoma County Judge, VIRGIL C. BLACK, Oklahoma County Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
