Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Williams v. Wilkinson et al
as 6:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Mario Williams
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson, Kathy Miller, Terry Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wideman et al
as 5:2012cv01365
Plaintiff:
Fred Smith
Defendant:
Brian Wideman, Rebecca Adams, Tim Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Bear, et al
as 12-6272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL BEAR, Warden's Assistant, JAMES RUDEK, Warden and DEBBIE MORTON, Grievance Appeal
BERRYHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012mc00533
Plaintiff:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, 10th CIRCUIT JUDGES and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Marshall v. Lee, et al
as 12-6257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY GENE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES LEE, Correctional Officer, A. ARMSTRONG, Sergeant, TRACY ELLIS, Case Manager and others
Lee v. Sareg et al
as 5:2012cv01061
Plaintiff:
Haskell Lee, Sr
Defendant:
Pat Sareg, Chad Miller, Robin Roof and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Knox
as 12-6227
Petitioner:
ANTONE LAMANDINGO KNOX
Respondent:
WADE SCOTT, Chaplain, ROBERT COMPTON, Food Service, VALERIE FISK-WARD, Food Service and others
Whitmore v. Mask, et al
as 12-6224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBIN WHITMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
MINDY MASK, Inmate Trust Fund Supervisor, DAVID CLARK, Grievance Coordinator, DAVID MILLER, Warden and others
Green v. Sirmons et al
as 6:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Green
Defendant:
Marty Sirmons, Justin Jones, Debbie Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Scott, et al
as 12-7041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
WADE SCOTT, OSP FOOD SERVICE MGR., VALERIE WARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
