Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Miller v. Zink
as 19-2995
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Debi Miller
Defendant / Appellant:
Stacey Edmunds-Brickell and Christopher Murphy
Defendant:
State of Vermont, Elaine Crawford and Robert Zink
Miller v. Zink et al
as 2:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Debi Miller
Defendant:
Robert Zink, Christopher Murphy, Elaine Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Forbes et al
as 3:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Scarlett Forbes, Mark Frayne, Gerald Gonye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dignity Plus, Inc. et al v. Village of Central Square, New York et al
as 5:2011cv00557
Plaintiff:
Dignity Plus, Inc. and Donald Penoyer
Defendant:
Village of Central Square, New York , Board of Trustees of the Village of Central Square, New York , Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Central Square, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valot et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2010cv06832
Plaintiff:
Brian Valot and Debi Valot
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc. v. Tennessee Production Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00829
Plaintiff:
Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc. and Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Tennessee Production Center, Inc., John Norbert Stovall and Debi Stovall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
EMI Music Publishing, Inc. et al v. Big Mama Digital Entertainment et al
as 1:2009cv00664
Plaintiff:
EMI Music Publishing, Inc., EMI Music Publishing, Inc., EMI Entertainment World, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Big Mama Digital Entertainment, Chartbusters Karaoke, Tennessee Production Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
