Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Abukar et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 2:2014cv01137
Plaintiff:
Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Beagle, et al. v. Schwarzenegger, et al.
as 2:2014cv00410
Defendant:
James D. Hartley, Chris Meyer, Dwight Winslow, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich, Richard Burke, Charles Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beagle, et al. v. Schwarzenegger, et al.
as 1:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
Frederick Beagle , Don Belardes , Floyd Boyd and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2013cv02254
Plaintiff:
Corey Lamar Smith , Dion Barnett , Christopher Garner and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey A. Beard, Paul D. Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Trimble et al
as 1:2011cv01540
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
R. H. Trimble, H. Martinez, Deborah Hysen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Armstrong, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-17632
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN ARMSTRONG, JAMES AMAURIC, RICHARD PONCIANO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MATTHEW CATE, BERNARD WARNER and others
John Armstrong, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-17144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN ARMSTRONG, JAMES AMAURIC, RICHARD PONCIANO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MATTHEW CATE, BERNARD WARNER and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Armstrong, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-16716
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN ARMSTRONG, JAMES AMAURIC, RICHARD PONCIANO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MATTHEW CATE, BERNARD WARNER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
