Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ali v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv03056
Plaintiff:
Nasser Khalil Ali
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Deborah R. Gilg and Loretta Lynch
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rosberg v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv04075
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg
Defendant:
United States of America, Eric Holder, Deborah R. Gilg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DUE vs. CAMP, et al.
as 1:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F A GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Cooper v. Department of the Army et al
as 1:2014cv00059
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Cooper
Defendant:
Department of the Army , Secretary of the Army , Attorney General Of The United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sedano v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv03091
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Eric H. Holder , Jr.
Interested Party:
Deborah R. Gilg and Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kay Sedano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Cooper v. Department of the Army et al
as 4:2013cv03086
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Department of the Army, Deborah R. Gilg and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Wolvin
as 4:2013cv03080
Defendant:
US Attorney Deborah R. Gilg, US Attorney General Eric H. Holder , Jr. and Carolyn W Wolvin
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Robert C Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gadekan v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2012cv03208
Defendant:
1-100 Unknown USDA Officials, 1-100 non-USDA employees, Beverly Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
John A. Gadekan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
