Cases 1 - 10 of 69
ProNM Energy Inc. v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
ProNM Energy Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Debra Anne Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Falkirk Mining Company, The v. United States Department of the Interior, The et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Falkirk Mining Company, The
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, The, Debra Ann Haaland, Bureau of Land Management, The and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1276 Interior: Review of Agency Action
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Palmer v. United States Department of Interior, et al.
as 1:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Earl Palmer and Debra Haaland
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Susan Bates, Craig Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of North Dakota v. United States Department of Interior, The et al
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, The, Debra Ann Haaland, Bureau of Land Management, The and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2022cv00247
Petitioner:
State of Wyoming
Respondent:
United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, United States Forest Service and others
Intervenor:
Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Consolidated Petitioner:
Western Energy Alliance and Petroleum Association of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
TWIN METALS MINNESOTA LLC et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv02506
Plaintiff:
TWIN METALS MINNESOTA LLC and FRANCONIA MINERALS (US) LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA ANN HAALAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35583
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, by and through the Office of Species Conservation and the Idaho Fish and Game Commission
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
