Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Defense Distribution Post Security et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Marilyn M. Smith
Defendant:
Defense Distribution Post Security, Defense Distribution Supply Depot, Defense Logistic Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SeMa'j Griffin v. Secretary of Defense
as 23-3220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEMA'J GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY and SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Kiesling v. USA et al
as 4:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Ruby Christine Kiesling
Defendant:
USA, Global Logistics Corporation, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Kiesling v. USA et al
as 4:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ruby Christine Kiesling
Defendant:
USA, Global Logistics Corporation, Defense Logistics Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Kiesling v. USA et al
as 4:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Ruby Christine Kiesling
Defendant:
USA, Global Logistics Corporation, Defense Logistics Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Griffin v. Defense Logistics Agency
as 2:2021cv03922
Plaintiff:
SeMa'j Griffin
Defendant:
Defense Logistics Agency
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
VIZOCOM ICT LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00217
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
Plaintiff:
VIZOCOM ICT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2014cv00757
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Marie Smith
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Defense Logistic Agency, Debra Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2013cv00336
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Marie Smith
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Robert M. Gates, Defense Logistics Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
