Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bryant v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv02479
Defendant: Morgan Giacomo, John Doe 2, C/O Deliane and others
Plaintiff: Patrick Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04322
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. Emily et al
as 2:2022cv00939
Plaintiff: Tommy Edward Jackson
Defendant: Emily, Doctor Nate, Todd Delian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Delian et al
as 2:2022cv00940
Plaintiff: Tommy Edward Jackson
Defendant: Todd Delian and Heddie Michaels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al
as 21-35373
Defendant / Appellee: FLEX CHINA, DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, HUA-WEI TECHNOLOGIES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Demos v. Dominion Voting Systems et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00110
Defendant: Hua-Wei Technologies, Staple Street Capital, Flex China and others
Plaintiff: John Robert Demos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRAKEFORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04046
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: DELIAN DRAKEFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Delian P. Deltchev
as 3:2019ad00215
In Re: Delian P. Deltchev
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Type: Contract Insurance
Sulzer Mixpac AG v. Delian Technology & Trading Beijing Co., Ltd.
as 1:2018cv10987
Plaintiff: Sulzer Mixpac AG
Defendant: Delian Technology & Trading Beijing Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Ramirez v. Delian 6, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06661
Plaintiff: Mario Ramirez
Defendant: Delian 6, Inc., Minas Litos, Elias Litos and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?