Cases 1 - 10 of 685
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
as 2:2025mc00002
Petitioner:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
Defendant:
Dell Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Dell Inc. et al v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

as 3:2025mc80064
Petitioner:
Dell Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc.
Respondent:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
One-E-Way, Inc. v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01558
Plaintiff:
One-E-Way, Inc.
Defendant:
Dell Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
General Video, LLC v. Dell Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01530
Defendant:
Dell Technologies Inc. and Dell Inc.
Plaintiff:
GENERAL VIDEO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Anaconda, Inc. v. Dell, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01527
Defendant:
Dell, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anaconda, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Fuqua School of Business, et al
as 24-2869
Defendant:
EMERGENT GAME TECHNOLOGIES, TALECRIS BIOTHERAPEUTICS INC, SIGNALSCAPE INC and others
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR REDDY VURIMINDI
GENERAL VIDEO, LLC v. Dell Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00124
Defendant:
Dell Inc. and Dell Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
GENERAL VIDEO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 5:2024cv00908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
AGIS Software Development LLC v. Dell Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00662
Defendant:
Dell Inc. and Dell Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
AGIS Software Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Cloud Byte LLC v. Dell Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00637
Defendant:
Dell Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cloud Byte LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.