Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Curtis v. Oliver
as 1:2025cv00147
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Curtis
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Adkins et al
as 1:2024cv05074
Defendant:
Katharyn Spangler, Racheal Groffsky, Tamela Adkins and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURTIS v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
DEOUNTA DEMETRIUS CURTIS
Defendant:
Nurse NEWSOME, Officer DEWBERRY, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Butler et al
as 1:2018cv03643
Defendant:
Neil Butler and Maytac Taylor
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Conway
as 1:2018cv03198
Defendant:
R.L. Butch Conway
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Demetrius Curtis v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 16-2091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Demetrius Curtis
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs), Shelia Sharp, Director, Arkansas Community Correction, Kerri Craig, Parole Officer, Arkansas Parole and Probation and others
Curtis v. Hobbs et al
as 4:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Curtis
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Shelia Sharp, Kerri Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Demetrius Curtis v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 14-3878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Demetrius Curtis
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Bass, Mrs., Record Clerk, Delta Regional Unit, Kerri Craig, Parole Officer, Arkansas Probation and Parole and others
Curtis v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2014cv00358
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Curtis
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Bass, Kerri Criag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
