Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Blount et al v. Humphries
as 2:2024cv03185
Plaintiff:
Nikita Blount
Defendant:
Eugene Humphries and Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Morup v. McDonough
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Morup
Defendant:
Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Foster v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONOVAN J. FOSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv06713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Drevaleva v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, et al.
as 23-4392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and DENIS MCDONOUGH, in his capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 301 et seq Veterans Affairs, General Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
