Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Washington v. Gelsinger
as 8:2019cv01696
Petitioner:
Keith A Washington
Respondent:
Warden Denise Gelsinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Gelsinger et al
as 8:2019cv01669
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Maryland and Warden Denise Gelsinger
Petitioner:
Tramonta Allen Jamar Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Moyer et al
as 8:2019cv00601
Defendant:
Denise Gelsinger, Mr. Stephen T. Moyer, Rich Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Avon Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ryidu-X v. Doe et al
as 1:2018cv02641
Defendant:
Ofc. Jones, Sgt. Wilson, Lieutenant Atkins and others
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Burgess v. Wehn et al
as 8:2018cv02168
Defendant:
Denise Gelsinger, Stephen Meyer and Wehn
Plaintiff:
Keith Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Alabi v. Gelsinger et al
as 8:2018cv01443
Petitioner:
Akinfemiwe Alabi
Respondent:
Denise Gelsinger, Roxbury Corr. Institution and Attorney General State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Azaniah Blankumsee v. Maryland Dept of Public Safety
as 17-7329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AZANIAH BLANKUMSEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, DPSCS, DAYENA CORCORAN, Commissioner of Corrections, WARDEN RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR. and others
Jackson v. Gelsinger
as 1:2017cv02843
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson
Defendant:
Denise Gelsinger, Malloy and Shemko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Gelsinger et al
as 8:2017cv01715
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas
Defendant:
Denise Gelsinger, Richard Graham, Jr., D. Faulkner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James J. Jardina v. Dept. of Public Safety
as 17-6413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES J. JARDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR., Warden (WCI), DENISE GELSINGER, Asst. Warden (WCI) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
