Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Burns v. Stroud et al
as 2:2021cv10795
Defendant:
Tanisha Davis, Leah Clisby, UCHC Detroit and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dennis Burns, Sr.
Mary Amador, et al v. Leroy Baca, et al
as 20-56278
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MYESHIA WILLIAMS, DIANE VIGIL, DIANA PAIZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a California public entity, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a governmental entity, LEROY D. BACA, Sheriff, in his official capacity and others
Appellant:
LECIA L. SHORTER
Mary Amador, et al v. Leroy Baca, et al
as 20-55965
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MYESHIA WILLIAMS, DIANE VIGIL, DIANA PAIZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a California public entity, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a governmental entity, LEROY D. BACA, Sheriff, in his official capacity and others
Appellant:
LECIA L. SHORTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 1 U.S.C. § 102
Burns v. Montgomery County Police Department
as 8:2016cv03222
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dennis Burns, Sr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peter Mesquita v. Los Angeles Sheriffs Department
as 2:2016cv05904
Defendant:
Leroy Baca, Dennis Burns, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Mesquita
Pierce v. City of Palo Alto et al
as 4:2015cv06117
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brian Pierce
Defendant:
City of Palo Alto, Dennis Burns and Dan Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pierce v. City of Palo Alto et al
as 5:2015cv06117
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Pierce
Defendant:
City of Palo Alto, Dennis Burns and Dan Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Whitfield
as 1:2015cv04827
Defendant:
Spvsr. Berkley, Denise Brockington, Dennis Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Lorren Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
