Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Alford et al v. The NFL Player Disability & Survivor Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Jason Alford, Daniel Loper, Willis McGahee and others
Defendant:
The NFL Player Disability & Survivor Benefit Plan, The NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan, The Bert Bell/ Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Curran v. United Services Automobile Association et al
as 2:2019cv00646
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association and United States Automobile Association
Plaintiff:
Dennis Curran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv13756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Britain et al v. Clark County, Nevada
as 2:2012cv01240
Plaintiff:
Trina Britain, Ronald Brooks, Bret Cegavske and others
Defendant:
Clark County, Nevada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Curran v. Actavis Totowa, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00524
Plaintiff:
Dennis Curran
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tang v. Fabbri et al
as 1:2008cv11827
Plaintiff:
Toan Tang
Defendant:
Michael Fabbri, Kerry Aleman, Creag O'Leary and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. Middlesex County Massachusetts et al
as 1:2008cv11779
Plaintiff:
Toan Tang
Defendant:
Middlesex County Massachusetts, Dennis Curran, Hamlin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. Kearns et al
as 1:2008cv11233
Plaintiff:
Toan Tang
Defendant:
Joseph J. Kearns, Creg O'Leary, Dennis Curran and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bender v. Corcoran et al
as 1:2008cv05816
Plaintiff:
Sherry Bender
Defendant:
Robert Corcoran, Ehren Reynolds, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
