Cases 1 - 10 of 15
FREEMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06608
Plaintiff:
DENNIS FREEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Dennis Freeman
as 17-2114
Petitioner:
In re: DENNIS FREEMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Freeman v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08878
Plaintiff:
Dennis Freeman
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adrean, et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv06767
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Adrean , Dennis Batchelor , Karen Batchelor and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman Jr v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2015cv00129
Plaintiff:
Dennis Freeman Jr
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of and David Gladieux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. USA
as 7:2013cv00229
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dennis Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Dennis Freeman
as 13-2393
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DENNIS FREEMAN, a/k/a Nadheer Freeman
FREEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv01382
Plaintiff:
DENNIS FREEMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. New York State
as 12-1317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dona J. Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State, New York State Police, James W. McMahon, New York State Police Superintendent and others
Freeman v. Brown et al
as 1:2011cv08599
Plaintiff:
Dennis Freeman
Defendant:
Dorothy Brown, Melvin E Darby, Jerry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
