Cases 41 - 50 of 108
Leggins v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2016cv04148
Plaintiff:
Artie Pawnee Leggins
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Tim Reisch, Bob Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Long v. Dennis Daugaard, et al
as 16-3811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Edward Long
Defendant - Appellee:
Governor Dennis Daugaard, Sec. of Prisons Dennis Kaemingk and Parole Board
Petersen et al v. Kaemingk et al
as 3:2016cv03039
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Petersen, Melissa Boyer, Venessa Joven and others
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Brenda Hyde, Steve Allard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Litschewski v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2016cv04140
Plaintiff:
Richard Litschewski
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley and Jennifer Stanwick-Klemik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vice v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2016cv04127
Plaintiff:
Derek Vice
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Darrin Young, Bob Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flying Horse v. Hansen et al
as 4:2016cv04119
Plaintiff:
Flying Horse and Joseph R. Flying Horse
Defendant:
Hansen, James Hansen, Doug Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Kinter v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 16-3333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas Kinter
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, Director of Prison Operations, Darren Young, Warden, SDSP, Troy Ponto, Associate Warden, Jameson Annex and others
Young v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2016cv04110
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Douglas Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Bob Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Daugaard et al
as 4:2016cv04102
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Long
Defendant:
Dennis Daugaard, Dennis Kaemingk and Parole Board Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabrera-Asencio v. Young et al
as 4:2016cv04096
Plaintiff:
Cristian Cabrera-Asencio
Defendant:
Darin Young, Denny Kaemingk, Elizabeth Vitetta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
