Cases 1 - 10 of 51
(PS)Smith v. Armstrong
as 2:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
Dennis Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brangwynne et al
as 3:2019cv00620
Defendant:
Deputy J. Hann, Deputy K. Brangwynne, Deputy A. Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
O'Brien et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv05868
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Thomas Schmalzried, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip O'Brien and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2013cv01730
Plaintiff:
Oshay Johnson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Board of Parole Hearings, Brian Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Cate et al
as 2:2012cv02708
Plaintiff:
Gordon Brooks
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Jack Garner, Dennis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. Bryson, et al
as 2:2010cv01915
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Reece
Defendant:
Sandra Bryson and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Smith et al
as 1:2010cv01015
Defendant:
Dennis Smith, Harley Lappin, Robert McFadden and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ward v. Sisto et al
as 2:2010cv00034
Petitioner:
Oscar Columbus Ward
Respondent:
Dennis Kris Sisto, J. W. Haviland, Gary Swarthout and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. McFadden et al
as 1:2009cv01310
Plaintiff:
Prince Jones
Defendant:
Robert McFadden, Robert McFadden, Robert McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. McFadden et al
as 1:2009cv00957
Plaintiff:
Prince Jones
Defendant:
Robert McFadden, Robert McFadden, Robert McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
