Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
DeAnda et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv10798
Plaintiff: Laney DeAnda, Amber Timms and Kayla Heidger
Defendant: James Deon Lee, Tropical Touch Spas, LLC, Southgate Reiki, LLC d/b/a Tropical Touch Southgate and others
DeAnda v. Southgate Reiki LLC et al
as 4:2023cv10668
Plaintiff: Laney DeAnda
Defendant: Southgate Reiki LLC d/b/a Tropical Touch Southgate, Latoca Relaxation Center, LLC d/b/a Tropical Touch Sterling, Tropical Touch Mt. Clemens, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Darren Smith v. City of Forrest City Arkansas, et al
as 21-3703
Plaintiff / Appellant: Darren Smith
Defendant / Appellee: City of Forrest City, Arkansas, Deon Lee, Individually and as Chief of the Forrest City Police Department and Cedric Williams, Individually and as Mayor of the City of Forrest City, Arkansas
LEE v. INCH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00117
Petitioner: RONALD DEON LEE
Respondent: MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00326
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff: Deone Lee and Davey Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00012
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
White v. Bible et al
as 2:2019cv00111
Defendant: Forrest City Arkansas, City of, Pamela Bible, Mary Bible and others
Plaintiff: Dorothy White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Bible et al
as 2:2019cv00040
Defendant: Pamela Bible, Mary Bible, Forrest City, City of and others
Plaintiff: Dorothy White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Hughes
as 5:2018mj00289
Defendant: Deon Lee Hughes (1)
Plaintiff: USA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?