Cases 1 - 10 of 1,406
Stevens v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 1:2025cv02719
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stevens
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of the Army and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv05212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Henderson v. Dept. of the Army
as 25-540
Plaintiff:
TERENCE HENDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, GERMANY and NATO
Marquis Harris v. Department of the Army U.S. Claims Service
as 25-1182
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS LAMONT HARRIS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES CLAIMS SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Redd v Department of the Navy
as 1:2025cv00312
Plaintiff:
Phelicea M. Redd
Defendant:
Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Notz v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2025cv00095
Plaintiff:
Arthur M. Notz, III
Defendant:
United States Of America and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shilling et al v. Trump et al
as 2:2025cv00241
Plaintiff:
Commander Shilling Emily, Commander Blake Dremann, Lieutenant Commander Geirid Morgan and others
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, United States of America, Peter Hegseth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RIVERA v. AVERILL et al
as 1:2025cv00350
Plaintiff:
RICARDO H RIVERA
Defendant:
MARK AVERILL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and ARMY BOARD FOR THE CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
