Cases 31 - 40 of 85
DURR v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
as 1:2019cv01340
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY and OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DURR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Charles Foster v. Department of Army
as 19-1777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles A. Foster
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Army, Secretary, Mark T. Esper
Rein v. Esper
as 19-842
Defendant / Appellee:
Secretary Eric K. Fanning, United States Department of the Army, United States Department of Army, Secretary Dr. Mark T. Esper, United States Department of the Army and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donna Rein
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FEDERAL PRACTICE GROUP v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
as 1:2019cv00031
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Plaintiff:
The Federal Practice Group and FEDERAL PRACTICE GROUP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Miller v. United States Department of Ar
as 19-46
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marytherese Miller
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Army and Mark T. Esper
Evans et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv01989
Plaintiff:
Kevin A Rivera and Crystal V Evans
Defendant:
United States Attorney District of Maryland, Department of Army, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PARKER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2018cv00748
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MONROE PARKER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Randle v. Esper et al
as 4:2017cv04326
Plaintiff:
Gloria Randle
Defendant:
Mark T. Esper and Department of Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tambasco et al v. United States Department of Army et al
as 3:2017cv01857
Plaintiff:
Robert Tambasco and Lori Tambasco
Defendant:
United States Department of Army, Tobyhanna Army Depot Police Department and Claus D Hensley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
