Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Doe v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv01139
Petitioner:
John Doe
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Adan v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Halima Adan
Defendant:
City of Portland, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Batchelor v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Demetrus Batchelor
Defendant:
City of Portland, Department of Homeland Security, US Marshals Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bassi v. Four Unknown Named Agents of Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2022cv00743
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Bassi
Defendant:
Four Unknown Named Agents of Department of Homeland Security, Gabriel Russell, Allen Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01483
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
